|
 |



We hope that
you'll feel our website is worthy enough to contribute a few pounds to
the bandwidth bills.
|



|
|
 |
|
Last
uploaded : Wednesday 17th Aug 2005 at 21:55 |
Contributed
by : Nick Thorp |
Dear Sir/Madam, >Reference your article about Malcolm Glazer - I don't think I've ever read >such a badly researched, factually incorrect, scaremongering article. > >If you had bothered to investigate why United fans are against Mr Glazer >taking over Manchester United, you would find that the fact he is American >is of no importance - and the fact he is jewish has not even been widely >reported, let alone of any interest! The reason they object is because Mr >Glazer has saddled a previously debt-free club with over ?600 million of >debt, and because of his record in business dealings both as owner of the >Tampa Bay Bucaneers and of other businesses. A man who promised a new >ground for the club and then threatened to move the club to another city >if the city did not pay for it. A man who sued his own family for his >mother's inheritance when he was already rich enough. > >You mention "Chelski" (which is actually a tabloid nickname for Chelsea >FC, not its new owner) but the crucial difference there is that Roman >Abramovich has pumped large amounts of money INTO the club. Mr Glazer has >created debt where there was none. If this debt is not paid, the club is >in danger. He can not promise that ticket prices will not eventually pay >for this. How are we to believe he won't sell the ground? > >The "bringing of American ways" to England is another issue that doesn't >even exist! I've not heard a single person mention this. Although, as it >happens, yes, I would rather we had our intense atmosphere at matches, >rather than the jingle dominated pap many american sports events seem to >suffer from. >So Tampa Bay won a Superbowl? Big deal, Wimbledon FC won the FA Cup 17 >years ago. They no longer exist. Coventry City did the same, and now >languish in the lower divisions. Are we to expect United to win the >European Cup and then go bankrupt and disappear? > >As for your hopeless attempt to raise sympathy by mentioning the war, just >what exactly has that got to do with anything?! Did no brave British >soldiers die in the war? Your comments are an insult to all involved in >that era. > >Kindly restrict yourself in future to writing editorials on subjects about >which you have at least a minimal understanding. > >Regards >Nick Thorp
|
|
|
 |
|