Home Page

carol gould

Join our email list for updates.




We hope that you'll feel our website is worthy enough to contribute a few pounds to the bandwidth bills.



Last uploaded : Thursday 23rd Jul 2009 at 15:26
Contributed by : Carol Gould


To join a discussion of this op-ed please go to:

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/newsweeks-embarrassing-homage-to-obama/ .


The only time in my life as a broadcaster that I departed from impartial analysis was after 9/11, when I waxed lyrical about Donald Rumsfeld. He had united a fractured nation with his oft-hilarious press conferences. His wit and raw patriotism were an inspiration to many at home and to those of us suffering abroad in a fiercely anti-American world. However adoring the press were towards Rumsfeld, nothing equals in unctuousness a recent issue of Newsweek, “Obama on Obama.”

Journalists are supposed to be impartial in reporting on the peregrinations of leaders. Little wonder I nearly dropped my pizza slice all over my Don’t Tread on Me t-shirt when I saw the aforementioned issue of Newsweek with the President on the cover. Apparently this is the twenty-sixth time Barack Hussein Obama has been on Newsweek and Time covers since 2007. Newsweek was renamed ‘Obamaweek’ on a Fox News panel show in mid-June and this made me happy because I thought I was overreacting when the text of the O feature began to muddle my grey matter.

It should be noted that I am not a rabid Obama-hater and have, in previous op-eds, noted the joy with which my late, devoutly liberal mother, a lifetime fighter for gay and civil rights, would have kvelled on November 4th, 2008. My problem with Newsweek is that the man is being lionised before he has achieved anything great on behalf of his beleaguered nation. It should also be noted that it is not proper to attack a fellow journalist, but I felt compelled to critique Jon Meacham’s profile of the President because it bordered on hero-worship. Were she alive My late mother would argue that she would have been paralysed with awe interviewing Franklin Delano Roosevelt, but, whether one loves or loathes the legacy of FDR BHO is not yet in that league.

This is what offends me:

In the feature about President Obama Jon Meacham kicks off with “Barack Obama, moving as he wishes to move, and the world bending itself to him..” What does this mean? Yes, he did bend to the Saudi Princes. When he went to Russia in July did Vlad Putin bend to him? Vlad was not even at the airport and was probably practicing his karate moves in his personal Kremlin gym. As we breathe American flags are still aflame in various world capitals. There are millions of folks bending more passionately than ever to ayatollahs, not to images of the President of what they still perceive as the Great Satan nation.

Meacham goes on to observe that the travails of Obama’s days as a community activist have metamorphosed into “a palpable feeling of authority and effectiveness. What he says, what he does, what he decides: it matters, and he loves that..” Well, we should be glad that the President likes his job but as things seem to be going from bad to worse from the economy to world affairs to state budget disasters it seems what he says does not matter to the folks slaughtering one another in Honduras, China, the Middle East, the Gulf, Africa and a few more other troubled locales.

As I write this British soldiers are being killed on a daily basis in Afghanistan in an alarming spike in the power of the Taleban. All manner of terror organisations are regrouping and Pakistan is on the brink of becoming another ninth century centre for Mullah-mania. So in this context Newsweek says that the President has taken on the automobile industry, the financial sector and terrorism -- in the magazine’s words, “he is the action.” Is action man having an effect? Ask Iranians. (More on that later…)

Meacham says he is delighted that the President remembered something he had written, though he acknowledges that White House staff had briefed the President on a Meacham piece moments before the interview. The journalist muses, “I knew he’d remember, or Well, he may be faking it with everybody else, but I bet he really did like that piece..” Omigosh! Is he meeting a supermodel on whom he has a mid-life crush or what? We even learn about “his voice rising ever so slightly, his head tilting back ever so subtly to a commanding angle..” and we also learn that the President is “Spock with global sex appeal.” Later on Meacham reports that the President gives him a Spock salute. Cute and human, but with the world in turmoil I prefer something of more, well, substance.

At this point I would like to go back in time to the moment when Rummyfans were legion and adored Don Rumsfeld’s every quip, even discussing on blogs his choice of necktie. Midge Decter was pilloried around the world in the liberal press for her book about the Secretary of Defense, perceived as a protracted love letter. As we watch the Israelis endure thousands of rocket attacks and Muslim countries continuing to move backwards in time, many lament the absence of a Rumsfeld, whose patriotism was blunt and who “was the action.” All across the world his “New Europe” and “Old Europe” observations are legendary; they have now become part of the regular discourse in Britain and Europe -- even sports and film writers refer to events in their milieux with those expressions. It will be interesting to see whether the Jon Meacham love letter to Obama will be seen in coming years as a world-altering screed.

Back to Obamaweek:

Rumsfeld was ridiculed for saying “The American people have a very strong centre of gravity.” In the Meacham interview President Obama says “ ..the American people..not only have a toleration but also a hunger for explanation and complexity..” He is absolutely right and one can only hope he is a “man of action” on that score: Americans need explanations for the worsening job scene, an escalating crime rate and rampant homelessness in white and blue collar regions.

It is notable that President Obama says we must talk to our enemies and hopes the “ Islamic Republic of Iran,” will “retain its Islamic character,” and that it will be a “member in good standing of the international community, ” adding that “we are going to reach out to them.” This interview took place before the June 12th elections and before the valiant people’s demonstrations in the Islamic Republic, a drama that seemed to generate a remarkable silence from the White House. The events in Iran in June ought to have resulted in a revolution with inspiring daily rhetoric from the United States but Obama says in the magazine that the American administration should merely encourage Ahmadinejad to “shift off a pattern over the past thirty years that hasn’t produced results in the region.” He adds that he will endeavor to make clear to Israel that these approaches are “superior to some of the other alternatives.”

That’s what Neville Chamberlain said. “Peace in our time.”

Heaven help us.
This article first appeared in 'Pajamas Media' under a contractual 48-hour embargo for re-pulication elsewhere.

http://www.pajamasmedia.com .


Read more Editorials    go >>



Web Design - Web Designers
© current viewpoint .com

All Rights reserved.
No copying of any text or images allowed in any form digitally or otherwise,
without the prior written consent of the copyright holders.